The question arises, how to get out of this deterministic loop?
Is it an eternal chicken and egg problem? No, when we consider
revolutionary practice we have an opportunity to breakout.
The German Ideology (146-200) [From SSR Notes]
Written by Marx and Engels in 1845-46, this is essentially an
elaboration of the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844,
with particular emphasis on the "materialist conception of history."
Covers three topics
materialist conception of history -- social/material connection among
men from start, history is history of changes in it
materialist conception of consciousness -- from the outset social and
"burdened with matter" (later we will encounter idea of consciousness
as always already embodied)
dominant ideology thesis
History
Again, the by now somewhat familiar picture of the stages of
development of the division of labor:
- tribal: elementary division of labor; extension of natural d of
l existing in family
- ancient communal: urban system of masters and slaves; communal
private property
- feudal state: rural system of lords and serfs; little d of l;
feudal organization of trades into guilds
Marx emphasizes the need to look at different societies and see how the
social and political structure of each is connected to production
Consciousness
Never pure. From the start material and social.
Marx offers some of "state of nature" ideas here. Beginnings of
consciousness of sociality.
(52a.9)But important step is when division of mental from material
labor happens. Permits "pure" conceptualization. Thinking
that is not thinking about reality. Thinking that can think that
it is thinking something real without actually thinking about actual
practice. Reification? Idealization? And treating
ideals as if things.
Possibility of false consciousness foreshadowed here?
Private Property and Communism
Family as first property.
Division of labor and private property identical.
I take this paragraph (RST 53a.4) to be saying that division of labor
is based on a sort of "each man (family) for himself" ethic and that it
destroys or at least sets up a tension with the "general welfare" which
is a real thing rooted in interdependence. Div of labor gives
everyone a job and you simply have to do it to survive regardless of
what you want to do. By contrast, in a communist society
"...possible for me to do one thing today adn another
tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in
the evening, criticize after dinner, just as I have a mind, without
ever becoming hunter, fisherman, shepherd, or critic (53b.2)"
Dominant Ideology Thesis
"The ideas of the ruling class are in every epoch the
ruling ideas, i.e. the class which is the ruling material force
of society, is at the same time the ruling intellectual force"
(53b.4)
Marx here introduces an idea which continues to have a lot of traction
: "the means of mental production."
An added provocative point : "The ruling ideas are nothing more than
the ideal expression of the dominant material relationships...."
- Concerning the Production of Consciousness: The ideas of
the
ruling class are the ruling ideas (p. 172).
- The Real Basis of Ideology:The greatest division of
material
and mental labor is the separation of town and country. This is the
separation
of capital and landed property and the beginning of property having its
basis
only in labor and exchange (p. 176).
- Big industry universalized competition and thus produced "world
history" for the first time (i.e., people were not dependent on the
whole world to satisfy their wants).
- Relation of State and Law to Property: Through the
emancipation
of private property from the community, the State has become a separate
entity,
outside civil society. The State is the form in which the individuals
of
a ruling class assert their common interests.
- Communism differs from all previous movements in that it
overturns
the basis of all earlier relations of production and intercourse (p.
193). Only in the community is personal freedom possible (p. 197).
Leading Questions
- Recall that this "lecture" is called "Marx, Knowledge, and
Ideology" -- what tools for the analysis of knowledge and ideology can
we take away from it?